schizoidman to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agoSolar modules deployed in France in 1992 still provide 75.9% of original output powerwww.pv-magazine.comexternal-linkmessage-square162fedilinkarrow-up11.07Karrow-down13 cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zipenergy@slrpnk.nettechnology
arrow-up11.07Karrow-down1external-linkSolar modules deployed in France in 1992 still provide 75.9% of original output powerwww.pv-magazine.comschizoidman to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square162fedilink cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zipenergy@slrpnk.nettechnology
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·6 months ago basically exactly the same situation as we’re in now You think if we take away 50 years of burning fossil fuels we’d be in “the same situation as we’re in now”?? Wtf are you smoking?
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·6 months ago As if it’s fucking green activists blocking nuclear and not the fossil fuel lobby It literally is, though I suspect the greens are the useful stooges of the fossil fuel propaganda.
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 months agoSo I quoted this sentence: As if it’s fucking green activists blocking nuclear and not the fossil fuel lobby And then you started talking a bunch of blah blah about renewables, which I will note is NOT in that sentence. And you did not mention nuclear, which I will note is the entire SUBJECT of that sentence.
You think if we take away 50 years of burning fossil fuels we’d be in “the same situation as we’re in now”?? Wtf are you smoking?
deleted by creator
It literally is, though I suspect the greens are the useful stooges of the fossil fuel propaganda.
deleted by creator
So I quoted this sentence:
And then you started talking a bunch of blah blah about renewables, which I will note is NOT in that sentence.
And you did not mention nuclear, which I will note is the entire SUBJECT of that sentence.