Renneder@sh.itjust.worksM to BecomeMe@sh.itjust.works · 5 months ago268% higher failure rates for Agile software projectswww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square18fedilinkarrow-up137arrow-down13cross-posted to: programming@programming.devprogramminghackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up134arrow-down1external-link268% higher failure rates for Agile software projectswww.theregister.comRenneder@sh.itjust.worksM to BecomeMe@sh.itjust.works · 5 months agomessage-square18fedilinkcross-posted to: programming@programming.devprogramminghackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-squareMotoAsh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-25 months agoWell that part can be totally fine. It is absolutely in no way what so ever an indication of something fishy if they’re giving the data and procedure they computed the number with. Statistics can and often do produce specific numbers. Who knew!?
Well that part can be totally fine. It is absolutely in no way what so ever an indication of something fishy if they’re giving the data and procedure they computed the number with.
Statistics can and often do produce specific numbers. Who knew!?