“Notably, Chang’s report claims that biological females develop earlier than males do, so requiring girls to enter school at younger ages will create classes in which the two sexes are of more equal maturity as they age. This, the author posits, makes it more likely that those classmates will be attracted to each other, and marry and have children further down the line.”

(…)

“The report does not include evidence of any correlation between female students’ early enrollment and the success rate of their romantic relationships with men. The author also does not detail specific mechanisms by which his proposed policy would increase romantic attraction or birthrates.”

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    24 days ago

    No, at some point the human population won’t be able to increase forever and as conditions are improving in poorer nations their birthrate is decreasing, I’m just pointing out the obvious, immigration is the solution to birthrate problems in some parts of the world and it’s the solution to overpopulation in other parts.

    Heck, that’s exactly what multicultural countries are doing, it’s an issue with Asian countries that refuse to welcome people of other cultures.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      the human population won’t be able to increase forever

      Just gonna point out that this isn’t a problem.

      • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        I would argue it is a problem in a capitalist society where constant and eternal economic growth is necessary.

        Then again, I would also argue that capitalism is the problem.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          Correct. If the masses benefitted from industrialization rather than just the corporations, we could have a high quality of life for everyone, population growth be damned.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        24 days ago

        Never said it was, but it’s ridiculous to think it’s normal to let certain territories become empty out of nationalistic pride when people are suffering out of lack of resources in other territories.

    • bean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Just to chime in. I was interested to randomly see in my feed the other day about how divorce between an American husband and Japanese wife, is at a lower rate than is between Japanese citizens.

      I found it interesting that some cultures might be slightly more compatible with each other.

      Anyway.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        Not surprising, Americans living in Japan don’t tend to adopt the crazy work schedule that’s considered normal over there.