• PlushySD@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Let me make it clear first. Generative AI is not art. Prompt engineering is not a real job.

    AI is just a tool. It is still waiting for an artist to use it to create art, just as a Photography or Photoshop image is not an art by itself.

    But… training with images is the same as humans learning how to draw, though… I know it’s boring but what you said is boring too. We could fall back to the same conversation over and over because you start with the same conversation again and again.

    FUCK AI, and also FUCK PEOPLE AGAINST AI, Good thing I hate everyone!

    • Fungah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I mostly agree with this. I’m coming to think that in the future defining the word “art” for the context of a discussion would avoid a lot of the back and forth I’m seeing here and help these discussions be more productive.

    • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      “Prompt engineer” is on a lower level than “tarot fortune teller” for me. As a fortune teller, you are required to have people skills, as a prompt engineer, you just have to be an opportunistic dork.

      • VerbFlow@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        A prompt engineer is nowhere near a tarot card user. Tarot cards do not contribute to a gigantic machine that eats job opportunities and spits out misinfo.