• nonailsleft@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Are you sceptical about the part where Russia can put a satellite into orbit or the part where they can make a nuclear bomb?

    • slurpinderpin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The part where they can put a a nuclear bomb on a satellite. Or that it would work even if they somehow pulled it off

      • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        We’re replying to a comment that states the US pulled it off 60 years ago

        • slurpinderpin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          No read that again buddy. We blew up a nuke in space. We didn’t send it on a rocket attached to a satellite

          • nonailsleft@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Do you know of some special secret law of thermodynamics that prevents us from putting a nuclear bomb in orbit?

      • evranch@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        During the Cold War, Russia launched quite a few nuclear powered satellites, and I mean real fission reactors, not just RTGs. Apparently they’re still up there and possibly still generating power. So it’s pretty much a proven fact.