WYSK: There funded by dark money PACS, but some good reporting has brought out these names: David Koch, Peter Thiel, Reid Hoffman, Mark Cuban, Harlan Crow, and Michael Bloomberg. Some of there members are most famous for stopping big bills. Joe Leiberman, for example, single handedly stopped the single payer portion of the ACA. Senators Joe Manchin and Kyrsen Simena kept the John Lewis voting rights act from passing, and famously kept the senate from repealing the filibuster.

    • Move to lemm.ee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 年前

      And you think that the dems wouldn’t magically find someone else to do a spoiler vote on issues they don’t really want to pass? Lmao why are americans this hilariously naive? These people do not represent the average working class person, they represent millionaires and billionaires, they represent the very corporate owners that the fediverse exists to escape from. When you finally realise this you will begin to start seeing through the bullshit. Half of this stuff can be done via Executive powers. They don’t do it because they do not want to.

      • TheDubz87@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 年前

        Unfortunately, we’re all so polarized left/right, red/blue, that everyone’s become blind to this. The big wigs started a culture/political war to keep us away from the class war. And they’ve won unfortunately. Part of the reason I can’t get I to politics with anyone, because while they all scream left or right, I’m out here on my soap box screaming tear the whole government down and start over. The “progressive” parties will only push as hard as they can without losing any of their/their corporate overlords excess income.

        • Move to lemm.ee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 年前

          The liberals will never recognise the trend of history that they’ve created, or take blame. They will blame the people instead, choosing to blame ontological factors over a materialist understanding of history.

      • thallamabond@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 年前

        The point of this entire post is to try to illustrate how you do not have to buy out an entire political party, when you only have to get to those on the margins of a majority.

        You put all democrats into a little box, things are more nuanced than that. Yes, people with tons of money have tons of influence is US politics, this post illustrates specific names and examples.

        Do you have anything to add to this conversation, or do you just want to paint with broad strokes?

        • bloodfart
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 年前

          That’s a historically illiterate argument. When there is enough of a majority to easily pass anything they want the democrats find all kinds of ways to say no. Their failure to enact the agenda they run on is not caused by slim majorities.

        • Move to lemm.ee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 年前

          I will paint party politics with broad strokes because that is exactly what party politics is. Collectives representing collectives. You don’t get to individualise it as and when it suits you, then collectivise it as and when it suits you at other times.

          The path of America from now until its end is liberals increasingly doing nothing to prevent the declining standards of living of millions of people while enriching the people they actually represent up until the population becomes so alienated that they give up on them. Then? Fascism. Until the country is torn into pieces.

          There is no off ramp. And I will continue to advocate that people organise around planning for this inevitability through means outside of the useless dems ushering in this fascism. Anything else is morally reprehensible.

          The Supreme Court just decided that businesses refusing business to protected minorities is free speech. The door is open for segregation again. What are the Dems going to do about it? Actually fucking use any powers in their hands or just tell people to voooooooote? They’ll do nothing, because they’re complicit.

          • thallamabond@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 年前

            Not a fan of todays supreme court decisions today either.

            The rest of your response is unhinged, I’m going to keep going to my day job, and voting for the most progressive candidates.

            • Move to lemm.ee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 年前

              There’s nothing “unhinged” about recognising the fact that I as a trans person am the subject matter of genocide legislation today and that all rights across the board are regressing as fascists continue to make gains even at times when Dems hold every single power necessary to stop them. The fact that you hand wave the direction of the country away when oppressed groups are screaming at them to do something (spoiler: they’ll keep doing nothing) is part of the reason that you’re seeing this enormous leftwards radicalisation and shift away from liberalism.

              Resorting to ableism because you don’t like people to your left critiquing you is also partially responsible.