Also, interesting comment I found on HackerNews (HN):

This post was definitely demoted by HN. It stayed in the first position for less than 5 minutes and, as it quickly gathered upvotes, it jumped straight into 24th and quickly fell off the first page as it got 200 or so more points in less than an hour.

I’m 80% confident HN tried to hide this link. It’s the fastest downhill I’ve noticed on here, and I’ve been lurking and commenting for longer than 10 years.

  • TheTetrapod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    If something is marketed as “unlimited”, I don’t think there is such a thing as “wildly excessive use”. This isn’t a competitive eater going to an all-you-can-eat buffet and being mad about getting kicked out. It’s a business using a service in a way that’s seemingly in-line with what they paid for.

    • JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s the same definition of “unlimited” that Telcos use: you pay for unlimited but it really is XXgb of data per month, after that they either disconnect you or throttle your traffic at a glacial pace…

      • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        And in both cases, that is bullshit. Just because it happens doesn’t mean we should accept it.