usernamesAreTricky to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 6 months agoRulei.imgur.comexternal-linkmessage-square64fedilinkarrow-up1983arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1982arrow-down1external-linkRulei.imgur.comusernamesAreTricky to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square64fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareusernamesAreTrickyOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up67·6 months agoRaising non-human animals ends up taking more plants anyway because they eat a lot of feed who’s energy is mostly lost. So if one were concerned with plants, eating plants directly results in fewer plants being killed
minus-squareToribor@corndog.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·edit-26 months agoIf your goal is to minimize the overall harm to plants through your own consumption the most ethical thing to eat is people.
minus-squareLucidlethargy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8·6 months agoIn glad we got to the bottom of this. People. People is the right answer, everyone. That’s a load off my mind! Let’s start a company. Maybe we can name it after what we’re saving. Something like… Soylent green?
Raising non-human animals ends up taking more plants anyway because they eat a lot of feed who’s energy is mostly lost. So if one were concerned with plants, eating plants directly results in fewer plants being killed
If your goal is to minimize the overall harm to plants through your own consumption the most ethical thing to eat is people.
Billionaires 🤤
In glad we got to the bottom of this. People. People is the right answer, everyone.
That’s a load off my mind! Let’s start a company. Maybe we can name it after what we’re saving. Something like… Soylent green?
Only if they are consenting?