• Zorque@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    I mean… are the employees not the union? Did they recommend it to themselves, then strike anyways?

    • Grass@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m pretty sure there is a problem in canada with union reps being secretly bought by corporate execs. I’m pointing to at least bcgeu who some years ago investigated themselves then said there was no corruption. The government section involved also self investigated with the same result. None of it made the news and the employees are under oath to never talk to media or post on socials about any aspect of work. The union for the gas company kept telling the workers to accept the agreement because its the best they will get, clearly without effort, and the broke ass workers voted for a shit contract because they would see brief immediate gains which was the bait that worked. meanwhile the port workers toughed it out pretty damn long.

    • Arcade@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Nestle was just lying. The quotes from the union in the article make it clear there has been no progress in talks.

      Negotiations with the Milkybar maker have had “zero advances”, the union said in a statement, with the next talks due to take place next week.

      Speaking at a rally held yesterday (24 May), Eamonn Clarke, president of the Unifor’s Toronto branch, Local 252, said: “It’s important for the company to present a fair offer where they recognise the difficulties workers face nowadays.

      “It’s not just about wages – it’s more than that. It’s about pensions and about their future. I’m proud of our members for not just looking at the short-term, but the long-term, and that’s why these proposals on pensions are so profound.”

      Corporations lying to try to get sympathetic press, who could have guessed that could happen?