• funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    can

    might

    sure. But, like I said, those are subject to a lot of caveats - that humans have to set the experiments up to ask the right questions to get those answers.

    • essteeyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      That’s how it currently is, but I’d be astounded if it didn’t progress quickly from now.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        i would be extremely surprised if before 2100 we see AI that has no human operator and no data scientist team even at a 3rd party distributor - and those things are neither a lie, nor a weaselly marketing stunt (“technically the operators are contractors and not employed by the company” etc).

        We invented the printing press 584 years ago, it still requires a team of human operators.

        • essteeyou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          A printing press is not a technology with intelligence. It’s like saying we still have to manually operate knives… of course we do.

          • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            the comment I originally replied to claimed AI will design the autonomous machines.

            It will not. It will facilitate some of the research done by humans to aid in the designing of willfully human operated machinery.

            To my knowledge the only autonomous machine that exists is a roomba, which moves blindly around until it physically strikes an object, rotates a random degree and continues in a new direction until it hits something else.

            Even then, it is controlled with an app and on more expensive models, some boundary setting.

            It is extremely generous to call that “autonomy.”

            • essteeyou@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              I was in a self-driving taxi yesterday. It didn’t need to bump into things to figure out where it was.

              • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Fair, I thought they all got recalled but I guess they’re back. but I’d also counter that Waymo is extremely limited about where it can operate - roughly 10 miles max - which, relevant to my original point was entirely hand-mapped and calibrated by human operators, and the rides are monitored and directed by a control center responding in real-time to the car’s feedback.

                Like my printing press example - it still takes a large human team to operate the “self” - driving car.