• Murvel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    4 months ago

    It feeds and evolves a disorder which in turn increases risks of real life abuse.

    But if AI generated content is to be considered illegal, so should all fictional content.

    • SigHunter@lemmy.kde.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Or, more likely, it feeds and satisfies a disorder which in turn decreases risk of real life abuse.

      Making it illegal so far helped nothing, just like with drugs

      • Murvel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s not how these addictive disorders works… they’re never satisfied and always need more.

    • Norgur@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Two things:

      1. Do we know if fuels the urge to get real children? Or do we just assume that through repetition like the myth of “gateway drugs”?
      2. Since no child was involved and harmed in the making of these images… On what grounds could it be forbidden to generate them?
      • HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I would love to see research data pointing either way re #1, although it would be incredibly difficult to do so ethically, verging on impossible. For #2, people have extracted originals or near-originals of inputs to the algorithms. AI generated stuff - plagiarism machine generated stuff, runs the risk of effectively revictimizing people who were already abused to get said inputs.

        It’s an ugly situation all around, and unfortunately I don’t know that much can be done about it beyond not demonizing people who have such drives, who have not offended, so that seeking therapy for the condition doesn’t screw them over. Ensuring that people are damned if they do and damned if they don’t seems to pretty reliably produce worse outcomes.