As far as I see that instance is a far-right cess pool. Everything I’ve got from that instance were low-quality transphobic “news articles”.

  • Ragnell@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Slight tangent: It’s been a recurring post on tumblr and mastodon that the Paradox of Tolerance is resolved when you consider tolerance to be a social contract rather than a moral standard. In that case, if someone does not uphold their end of the contract than the contract doesn’t apply to them.

    If you do not tolerate me, I do not have to tolerate you.

    As Nazism is based on intolerance of other views, there is no requirement for tolerating Naziism.

    The same applies to terfism. “Trans-EXCLUSIONARY radical feminism” is the acronym, it is a philosophy based on not tolerating trans people, and therefore there is no need to tolerate them.

    Contrast to say, furries, who are weird but who are defined by their enthusiasm for something rather than an exclusion of other interests. Furries, as a group are covered under the tolerance social contract.