• Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    It depicts a oppressors killing others using self defense as an excuse.

    Bullies victimizing themselves is a tale as old as time, as comic this was released in 1876. And very relevant today.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Do what? The source you linked stated it was about a white (U.S.) southerner and a black child. What “indigenous” person do you think is depicted here…?

      Edit: original comment said this was about a “colonist” and an “indigenous person”.

          • Linkerbaan@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            This was around 10 years after the abolishment of slavery in the south, was it not referencing that?

            If not what is the actual context?

            • ripcord@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’m being a little technical, but I think it’s important. He/she would have been either an ex-slave, or a child of slaves, or just in general an African most likely. But definitely not “a slave”.