California State University placed Sonoma State campus President Mike Lee on leave Wednesday after he agreed to protesters’ demands to involve them in university decision-making and pursue divestment from Israel.

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    OK, so you don’t agree with the anti-genocide people and decide not to divest from Israel, fine… but putting someone on leave for insubordination because they listened to reasonable requests to divert investments? That’s bullshit.

    • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Imagine the board came to an agreement with the protestors, but the president refused to abide by the agreement. You would not be surprised if he were suspended, after all the board is the president’s supervisor.

      Well, this is the same thing. The board didn’t want this agreement but the president went ahead without them. So the outcome is not surprising. Insubordination is insubordination regardless of which side you’re on.

      • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think it depends on whether investment choices is something the board normally weighs in on, but your point is good: if this were the other way around, I would probably feel the action was justified.

        • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Honestly investment choices is what I would expect a board to be most involved in. Why would the president be making investment calls?

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Remember when it was just conservatives silencing academics for speaking about civil rights and against human rights abuses?

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I mean, Biden did fight school busing to end school segregation during the day and hang out with Strom Thurmond at night…

        And he spoke against people protesting for civil rights back then too…

        There’s always been “moderate” Democrats who oppose social change, it’s just when we start simplifying things and calls everyone just Democrat and “vote blue no matter who”. Those assholes start running the show.

        There’s a lot of very rich people who want to make sure that’s as far left as America has the chance to go.

        Plus, even Donald Trump could get the Clinton’s to show up to his wedding for well less than 100k. Lots of shitty people donate to these “moderates” just to buy their way into the cool kids club and help public appearances.

        Despite some of them, well, being Donald Trump just like 20 years ago.

        Not everyone is on our side because they have a D by their name at the moment.

  • not_that_guy05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Dear California, my state, wtf are you doing? This is how it is suppose to work.

    Did the generation that did protests become the same people they hated? Maybe.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      For every white person getting arrested protesting civil rights from that generation, there was 10 spitting on Black kids for going to school.

      Boomers tried to rebrand themselves as all hippies, but they were a tiny fraction of that generation the rest openly hated and shit talked.

      The ones in power now with very very few exceptions were not on the right side of history.