• exohuman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    We had libertarians popular for a while in Michigan. Then they lost popularity. They usually align themselves to the right wing. In practice, they basically tried to block the government from helping the people at all. No school funding. No health care. Private ownership of all the land. No parks, protected lands or sanctuaries. No real environmental protections (so no public protection of the largest freshwater supply in the world, a precious resource), only property owners can sue for pollution, no gun regulations, no helping the poor or any social programs whatsoever, and a stronger state’s rights take on government (so the state can say no to everything too).

    The good parts to me were that they didn’t support drug war policies and they don’t believe in government discrimination against any groups (but the “government” part is important there so I guess that’s not that good).

    • Silinde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, everything you described is exactly what Libertarianism is in the 21st century - placing the needs of the individual or business above the needs of society in general, which includes advocating for as little government interference as possible. It’s why this meme, despite being Facebook cringe, is apropos.

    • Drewfro66@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the big problem with Libertarianism is that they have good ideas and bad ideas, but the powers that be use them to get the bad bits passed while blocking the good bits because they hurt shareholder profits.