David Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 7 months agoRemember how ChatGPT totally aced the bar exam? Wow! yeah, turns out that was just a liewww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square205fedilinkarrow-up1630arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up1630arrow-down1external-linkRemember how ChatGPT totally aced the bar exam? Wow! yeah, turns out that was just a liewww.nytimes.comDavid Gerard@awful.systemsM to TechTakes@awful.systemsEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square205fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
minus-squareWolfLinklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·7 months agoYes it is, in fact. Tiny, random variations, which typically take millions of years to end being a noticeable change.
minus-squareWarren Christmas@mastodon.me.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up8·7 months ago@WolfLink note how nothing there is “trying” to do anything
minus-squareWolfLinklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·7 months agoExactly my point. I’d expect humans trying to make something will get results on a timescale about a million times faster than evolution.
minus-squareearthquake@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·edit-27 months ago about a million times faster than evolution Ah, so you also think intelligent AI is at least 4000 years away.
Yes it is, in fact. Tiny, random variations, which typically take millions of years to end being a noticeable change.
@WolfLink note how nothing there is “trying” to do anything
Exactly my point. I’d expect humans trying to make something will get results on a timescale about a million times faster than evolution.
Ah, so you also think intelligent AI is at least 4000 years away.
lol