• meteokr@community.adiquaints.moe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      Raid0? You mean having two devices stripped across is rather than just one device with no stripping? Raid0 is a risk you take when you care more about performance than downtime to restore a backup.

      If I have 20TB of data, it cannot fit on a single 16TB drive. So my options are Raid, or this single drive option. I would always pick the single drive if I could afford it.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        Double check that symbol there.

        Raid 5 is a great balance of capacity and useful storage with 3 drives. You get 1 drive worth of fault tolerance and 2 drives worth of capacity. I personally have mismatched drives so I run raid 1 in between the matching sizes, and jbod between the raid 1 mirrors (well the zfs equivilent) And my really important data is backed up onto two more drives in raid 10.

        • meteokr@community.adiquaints.moe
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          6 months ago

          The person I replied to said

          I’m uncomfortable storing 16TB worth of data on one drive

          as a criticism of using a single 32TB drive.

          I argue that a single 32TB drive is less risk than using 2 16TB drives. Am I wrong?

          • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Christ alive.

            No. Actually. The 32TB drive is a single point of failure for all your data.

            Splitting it means you have 2 points of failure but for only half your data.

            From an integrity and availability standpoint the two disk solution, while wildly ridiculous and dumb as fuck, is actually better.

            Both solutions are ridiculous and dumb and are not sufficient backup.