I got into Civilization rather late with their fifth entry. I was hesitant because as I get older I need more time to game than I do new titles. Still I picked up six with all DLC during the last sale. I have to say I am liking the changes. It was good to wait because Civ does need its DLCs to feel complete.

On a side note, it runs quite nice on the Steam Deck (In desktop mode docked)

  • warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    5 is superior imo, it’s more simple to understand but has a lot to master. It’s more visually appealing too, Civ 6 throws so much extra crap at you.

    5 is more depth from simple mechanics. 6 is adding mechanics to try and make depth. I’d recommend 5 for sure, though 2K are kind of scummy and put 6 on discounts to try and force players into that and no longer really put Civ 5 on sale cause they know people would rather buy that.

    • Ms. ArmoredThirteen
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      6 also has a really bad habit of trying to hide a lot of stuff away from you for idk why, cleaner aesthetics? In 5 almost all the numbers are there out in the open ready to be looked at in-game and it makes approaching everything much easier for me

    • OpticalMoose@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I think 5 is what I’m looking for. Sometimes Civ (in general) gets out of hand with the micromanagement. I want something that’s kind of casual.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Yeah, 5 isnt too bad unless you got loads of units late game. 6 overwhelmed me from the get go.