misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 个月前Stack Overflow bans users en masse for rebelling against OpenAI partnership — users banned for deleting answers to prevent them being used to train ChatGPTwww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square386fedilinkarrow-up11.67Karrow-down19cross-posted to: tech@pawb.socialtechnology
arrow-up11.66Karrow-down1external-linkStack Overflow bans users en masse for rebelling against OpenAI partnership — users banned for deleting answers to prevent them being used to train ChatGPTwww.tomshardware.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 个月前message-square386fedilinkcross-posted to: tech@pawb.socialtechnology
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31arrow-down1·7 个月前I think the reason for those bans is that they don’t want you rebelling and are showing that they don’t need you personally, thus ban. Of course it’s all retained.
minus-squareRememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up33·7 个月前Isn’t it amazing that places like this built on user support and contribution turn around and pull a “we don’t need you”?
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·7 个月前They think they are too big to die by now. That userbase grows like crops, and isn’t conscious of how it’s being treated. That’s a bit like monopolists and Ponzi scheme owners think. It works sometimes.
I think the reason for those bans is that they don’t want you rebelling and are showing that they don’t need you personally, thus ban.
Of course it’s all retained.
Isn’t it amazing that places like this built on user support and contribution turn around and pull a “we don’t need you”?
They think they are too big to die by now. That userbase grows like crops, and isn’t conscious of how it’s being treated.
That’s a bit like monopolists and Ponzi scheme owners think. It works sometimes.