• entropicshart@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Never understood homes that pave/block out all the greenery; makes the home depressing af all for saving some 30min of upkeep per week.

      • zik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not to mention that portland cement has severe environmental impacts of its own.

      • FarFarAway@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        there’s a common misunderstanding in texas, as well, about cedar trees.

        a while back, a ranch owner with ALOT of land, who was considered a great steward of trees, was interviewed for an article and stated that new cedars used too much water and that he tears them all out of areas where he wants to maintain a forest of alternate trees (i.e. oak, elm, whatever, idk)

        everyone took that to mean tear out all cedar trees whether there was a forest of other trees or not, no matter how much land you have. they completely overlooked the qualifiers to practice this type of land management. (obviously owning cows are a different story, but almost none of these people own cows)

        a ridiculous amount of land in Central Texas (esp the hill country) now is barren save the 1 or 2 odd scraggly oak trees here and there. anytime someone buys land (even a couple of acres) the first thing they do is clear cut the damn place, causing unnecessary erosion, bringing in uneeded heat, and in general, killing the ecosystems that made that area special in the first place.

    • blterrible
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least they didn’t cover the bricks in cheap astroturf. Also there aren’t any derelict cars with blue tarp on them. Where are the tarp covered cars?