• astreus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m not flailing, I’m pointing out you are trying to rewrite history.

    On top of that the other commenter didn’t “destroy” my claim nor was it “bullshit”. They added context based on an assumption I didn’t make (i.e. vaccine = cure) which led me to do more research and add context that changed the level of enthusiasm I had.

    What was bullshit was you deciding it was disingenuous AND you saying I had made changes you had requested. Neither of those statements are true.

    “I believe your edit came either at the same time” - you do see the irony of asserting your belief like it’s fact in a thread where I added my belief to a fact and mangled it as a result? You do see it, right?

    I find it kinda funny that I admitted where I was wrong but you are literally unable to.

    Anyway, just clarifying: the OTHER poster got me to edit based on their HELPFUL comments. You didn’t do anything apart from state obvious facts about FDA approval and try to take credit for being so wise and insightful

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I provided timestamps.

      I never did shit but call out the the other dudes comment was good, and yours sucked. The fact you can’t drop this is flailing.

      The fact that you find my fda facts obvious, yet your didn’t use them in your original comment, takes us full circle to why I commented in the first place lol