Seen a lot of posts on Lemmy with vegan-adjacent sentiments but the comments are typically very critical of vegan ideas, even when they don’t come from vegans themselves. Why is this topic in particular so polarising on the internet? Especially since unlike politics for example, it seems like people don’t really get upset by it IRL

  • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    If we remove the ethic argument from the conversation, veganism is definitely a better choice for the planet, factually.

    People have a hard time detaching their ego from the issue at hand. Since veganism is better for the planet, they are “better” in that specific area of their life.

    But it doesn’t mean that vegans are better people than non-vegans, because we don’t know what else they do.

    Eat meat if you want. I do. But I don’t feel personally attacked because vegans are right about the carbon footprint of meat, and they preach for it.

    • IamtheMorgz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      7 months ago

      That choice is steeped in privilege though, and I think it’s worth acknowledging that. Food choices are just something we shouldn’t be judging other people on, regardless of what those choices are. “Fed is best” applies through all stages of life.

      • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        You are right, but we use this privilege to eat more meat instead of more vegetables. So my point still stands.

        And even then, meat is way pricier than vegetables, so the privilege argument is shaky.

        But as I said, assume the fact that you eat meat and that it is more damageable for the environment and after that, if you are in a position where you can afford to eat less or no meat, do it if you feel like it.

        • IamtheMorgz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Some people do, but it’s not as easy as “just eat better” for everyone. If we were arguing about how people aren’t eating healthy I think very few people would be frame it as just a choice.

          Cheap meat, fast food (few if any veggie options, and basically no vegan ones) - these are staples of the poor. There’s a limit to how much rice and beans anyone wants to eat, especially when just getting a couple pounds of ground beef is a luxury. I don’t think it’s right to shame people for taking the beef. Or judging them for taking it.

          I think if vegans want to change the world they should be campaigning against poor practices in the industry, not attacking the guy who just worked 16 hours at a minimum wage job and is choosing to grab a mcdouble rather than going home to cook a beyond burger. Is one better for the environment and world? Sure. But it’s not that guy’s fault the system is rigged in favor of the mcdouble, and reminding him of the fact that he’s making the world worse isn’t furthering the goal of making the world better.

          • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I understand your point and I agree. But a lot of privileged people (i’m included in that) should definitely consume less meat or none at all.

            This is a strange argument that the problem with vegans is that they don’t do enough for the poor?

            I haven’t seen any vegans protesting in a 7/11. It’s usually high end butcher or restaurants.

            So again, I agree with what you say, but it doesn’t make sense in the current frame of discussion.