There are no ethical choices under first-past-the-post voting. We must instead make a decision that reduces the most harm.

  • OBJECTION!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Missing out on $30 vs losing $30 (or $300, or $3000, etc) doesn’t change the dynamics of the situation.

    • Daft_ish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      It does.

      Maybe for someone who has nothing to lose it doesn’t.

      We call that privilege.

      • OBJECTION!
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The stakes can change your risk-benefit assessment, but the fundamental dynamics are the same. Even if there’s a gun to my head, there are limits to what deal I’ll accept. “Kill another captive and I’ll let you live five more minutes,” for example.