• Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    FYI 90% of those bots are scrapers and natural automation tools which are harmless.

    • hemmes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, and bots are software setup and configured by humans to do things for humans. It’s still kind of humans using the internet, just not actively at the keyboard.

  • TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    But is the Internet dying? The thing it doesn’t say is if the human participation is dwindling.

    To keep it simple, I’ll work with small numbers. Imagine there are 10 humans online. Now imagine 1 bot on online. Bots are 9% (1 in 11) of this imaginary online community. A year later, those same 10 humans are still online, but there are now 10 bots online; the bots are 50% of the community. This statistic can lead you to think there is less human participation when nothing happened to the humans. The difference is the raw number of bots. This is what I believe is happening, about the same number of humans, just an increasing number of bots, scraping, posting, etc.

    X/Twitter is dying because of mismanagement.

    • blurg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      Let’s extend this thought experiment a little. Consider just forum posts; the numbers will be somewhat similar for articles and other writings, as well as photos and videos.

      A bot creates how many more posts than a human? Being (ridiculously) conservative, we’ll say 10x more.

      On day one: 10 humans are posting (for simplicity’s sake) 10 times a day, totaling 100 posts. Bot is posting 100 a day. For a total of 200 human and bot posts; 50% of which are the bot.

      In your (extended) example, at the end of a year: 10 humans are still posting 100 times a day. The 10 bots are posting a total of 1000 times a day. Bots are at 90%, humans 10%.

      This statistic can lead you to think human participation in the Internet is difficult to find.

      Returning to reality, consider how inhuman AI bots are, with each probably able to outpost humans by millions or billions of times under millions of aliases each. If you find search engines, articles, forums, reviews, and such are bonkers now, just wait a few years. Predicting general chaotic nonsense for the Internet is a rational conclusion, with very few islands of humanity. Unless bots are stopped.

      Right now though, bots are increasing.

      • TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Bots are increasing. But the Internet is not dead/dying, just changing. Many of the “The 10 bots are posting a total of 1000 times a day.” are repost bots merely parroting human generated content.

        I wonder, though, if this will cause the scrapers to be impacted by the reposters or other AI generated content.

          • TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            So change means “dying”? So every time a tadpole evolves into a frog, a tadpole dies? Should we have protest signs that read, “FROGS KILL TADPOLES! DOWN WITH FROGS”?

            • blusterydayve26@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              But what if I wanted to communicate with humans instead of propaganda-bots? Then yes, that Internet is dead, and there’s no real fucking reason to be on most of those sites.

            • SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              No, that is not what I was talking about. In the current environment it is completely possible for some people to only have interactions with bots online, without even knowing. This may get worse and worse in the future. THAT is what “dead” internet implies, lifeless online interactions essentially.

              • TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                I suspect there will still be online interactions with humans, just more interactions with bots. Unfortunately, it’s we humans behind the mess. Even if we pass laws to stop it (or even forced labels of “I’m a bot” on bot accounts), some people won’t play by the rules. So the change is going to happen. We can try to persuade the public, but we know how well that works:

                A parody of the piracy ad from the 1980s 'home taping is killing music and it's illegal' cassette tape with crossbones. The words read 'online bots are killing social media and it sucks'.

                So what do you propose be done about it?

  • sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m sure it’ll be fine… oh, totally unrelated: has any one been on Usenet lately?

    • nyan@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Most Usenet discussion groups don’t even get spambot posts these days.

      • Zeoic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        There are chat groups with usenet? How does that work? I have only ever seen it used for downloading stuff.

        • nyan@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          Usenet started out as a forum-like system, with individual messages grouped into discussion threads (the protocol worked kind of like email, with messages indicating which other message they replied to, so that client software could build a tree for each group). That side of it was eventually killed off by lack of good moderation options or support for embedded media.

  • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Eh, most of those will just be scrapers, and fediverse inter-server communication is technically a bot.

  • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s a bit like Kessler Syndrome. The more bots on the net the more crap we have to filter through, until eventually we can’t use it because there’s too much crap.

  • daniyeg
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    can’t read this article, can some explain what their definition of bot is?

  • Mubelotix@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Bots don’t run themselves, they are run by humans. I have a lot of them myself