• MrNesser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’m more worried that they have created an arms race.

    How far will they go to attract new and retain players with new weapons.

    Looking forward to the quasar assault rifle

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah I’m pretty stoked for new stuff already, but I’m worried they’re going to “iPad baby” the community and risk losing attention if they don’t saturate us with new shit every few weeks.

      • tiberius@lemmy.caM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Unfortunately, that’s the reality of the live service market. You need to have content to keep players. At the rate AH is releasing patches and content, things will break.

    • all-knight-party@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      They’ve been pretty keen on balancing weapons regularly, so I don’t think they’d do that or else why even waste the time balancing and creating contention with the community over it, but time will tell

        • all-knight-party@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think it’s okay, for 99% of the balance changes I’ve agreed even though some of them I kneejerk disliked because it was a nerf of a weapon I liked.

          The biggest thing I’d disagree with is that they haven’t balanced all the weapons I think they should, but the changes they have made im not really mad about

        • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Pretty much every weapon is viable atm, so I can’t really agree. Even the worst picks fill a niche depending on your playstyle.