• snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I can’t imagine why a side that is actively working to overthrow society in the pursuit of fascism through deceptive means gets more scrutiny than the one that is mostly trying to keep the status quo or maybe make some small incremental improvements.

    Total mystery.

    • Clent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is basically a “both sides” argument cloaked in psychology.

      There is no need to research the political affiliation of the author because there is zero chance they aren’t a right wing tool.

      The lefts ability to recognize their nonsense isn’t a bias so much as a toolset used in maintaining one’s sanity.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      Of course it was done by someone at BYU and looks like the goal was to point out that people respond stronger to shitty fascists. Like the example was ‘love the guy who tried to overthrow the election’ got a stronger response from people who don’t want their government overthrown.

      • eighthourlunch@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        I pretty much ignore anything from BYU, but especially where psychology is involved. They shouldn’t even be accredited given how invested they were in conversion therapy.