FocusFire@lemm.ee to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 months agoWhy you should always respect your eldersi.postimg.ccimagemessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up1215arrow-down17
arrow-up1208arrow-down1imageWhy you should always respect your eldersi.postimg.ccFocusFire@lemm.ee to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squareooterness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·edit-27 months agoYes, very nice, but hear me out: What if all that but also railguns?
minus-squareDigitalTraveler42@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·edit-27 months agoRailgun tech isn’t there yet, the bottleneck is currently what’s bottlenecking a lot of higher tech, and that bottleneck is energy generation, storage, and consumption, so that’s why we don’t see more railgun and laser based tech.
minus-squareooterness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·7 months agoYou’re quite right, but this forum is for non-credible ideas, and we need something to counter the T-59.
minus-squareooterness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·7 months agoGatling railgun, only 1/6 the barrel wear per shot.
Yes, very nice, but hear me out: What if all that but also railguns?
Railgun tech isn’t there yet, the bottleneck is currently what’s bottlenecking a lot of higher tech, and that bottleneck is energy generation, storage, and consumption, so that’s why we don’t see more railgun and laser based tech.
You’re quite right, but this forum is for non-credible ideas, and we need something to counter the T-59.
Also barrel wear
Gatling railgun, only 1/6 the barrel wear per shot.
deleted by creator