Why do alt-history people never focus on infrastructure or innovation? What would have happened had bikes been invented centuries before cars instead of around the same time? How different would the built environment and our culture have looked?

Personally, I think centuries of more established bike use would have created an infrastructure that limits how well cars take off. Cities would have entrenched themselves in a cheap, dense manner of transit.

I could be wrong, lots of dense cities were wrecked by the car when it was commercialized. I’d love to hear any thoughts :)

  • David Jaša@cztwitter.cz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    @bluGill
    @Nyssa

    One more requirement for cars in addition to the precision manufacturing is a mobile source of energy like the ICE.

    Now I’m wondering if an alternative history with industries revolution powered just by water would be possible (once there is steam engine/turbine, internal combustion engine/turbine is just a matter of time).

    • JacobCoffinWrites@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      There was a brief window where ICE cars, electric cars, and steam cars existed simultaneously and all sucked just about equally