Microsoft says Sony paid third parties to keep games off Xbox

  • Omegan@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think the only response to this is for us all to remember that businesses are not our friends.

    Spencer can talk the talk about wanting games to be everywhere for anyone to play them but his words are meaningless if Microsoft published titles are getting caught up in PC and Xbox exclusivity arrangements.

    Sony can say what it wants about the dangers of Microsoft making games like CoD exclusive, but to this day they’re doing work behind the scenes to keep major titles like FFXVI to themselves for as long as possible.

    Business gonna business.

      • HexTrace@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        At this point I’m more concerned with Windows exclusivity. Obviously there’s a financial incentive for Xbox to only release on Windows, but it’s hard to argue you’re not locked into a platform in a similar way.

          • HexTrace@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 years ago

            When games are developed for “PC” that means “Windows” unless otherwise noted. If something works on Linux or OSX that is usually specifically called out on the game.

            The direction Windows is going with Win11 is concerning enough that a non-trivial number of people (myself included) are planning a move to Linux for desktop workstations once Win10 goes EOL next year. At that point I’d be locked out of games that only work on Windows in the same way I’m locked out from console exclusives. (And yes, I know it’s possible to emulate/Wine/dual boot - all of those options still require a license that I’m not interested in.)

            Steam seems to be pushing Linux pretty hard, and it’s working for a lot of develoeprs, but there’s still a lot of AAA games not jumping on that bandwagon.

            • Meshuggah333@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              Define “a lot of AAA games” ? Because right now almost everything on Steam just works on Linux besides the odd multiplayer games, and even that is slowly getting support. Heck, I even installed the just out Lies of P demo the other day, worked first try, no glitch, very good performance, like a native game.

            • blazera@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Now, i did mean exclusivity deals, because developers being contractually obligated to not develop for apple or linux, is very much different from developers not wanting to.

    • hdcase@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I don’t entirely disagree with you but there’s a huge difference between a company making a game or two exclusive, versus a company outright buying an entire publisher and making all their games exclusive for the rest of time.

    • Omegan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I don’t think you want that. The availability of consoles at different price points (all lower than a typical PC setup) lowers the barrier to entry for games and makes it viable for new games to be developed. Eliminating consoles would have severe implications to the industry.

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Im not getting a console instead of a PC. I have a PC, that I use for many things other than games. If I had no PC, I’d still have my dirt cheap pre-paid phone, that’s still plenty capable of playing surprisingly demanding games. And I need this phone at a bare minimum, for work and emergencies, this is the lowest barrier to entry I can go for games. Every generation of every console is an unecessary, additional barrier to entry for whatever corner of gaming they’re gating off. PC isnt trying to gate off anything, PC price is purely selling the capability to play more demanding games, run more demanding software, and I can pay for whatever level of gaming thats right for me. And there is no “typical” PC setup, you’re thinking of the most up to date and modern PC’s that are overkill for anything. Graphics card from 7 years ago and you can play Elden Ring. I dont need or want an iPhone 14, and I dont need or want a 3080. Imagine every single game out or announced so far was available for PC, any game I would want to play, my PC could handle.

        • Omegan@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          We’re not talking about you (1 consumer). You’re reading too much into this and you’re missing (or purposely ignoring) the general economics of purchasing a console versus a computer.

          • blazera@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Im an exemplary consumer if you care about financial barriers to entry. I do not make much money, and thus i do not get to play many games that are gated by console exclusivity, if you care about barriers to entry. I do not think you do.