It’s a slightly click-baity title, but as we’re still generating more content for our magazines, this one included, why not?

My Sci-fi unpopular opinion is that 2001: A Space Odyssey is nothing but pretentious, LSD fueled nonsense. I’ve tried watching it multiple times and each time I have absolutely no patience for the pointless little scenes which contain little to no depth or meaningful plot, all coalescing towards that 15 minute “journey” through space and series of hallucinations or whatever that are supposed to be deep, shake you to your foundations, and make you re-think the whole human condition.

But it doesn’t. Because it’s just pretentious, LSD fueled nonsense. Planet of the Apes was released in the same year and is, on every level, a better Sci-fi movie. It offers mystery, a consistent and engaging plot, relatable characters you actually care about, and asks a lot more questions about the world and our place in it.

It insists upon itself, Lois.

  • ReCursing@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I always thought the biggest problem was the marketing - John Carter is not a name that tells you anything at all about the film’s setting and I don’t recall anything much promoting it suggesting it might be that John Carter even if you did know the source material at all!

    But i am with you, it was a fun popcorn movie, and sometimes that’s what you really want

    • Jon-H558@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep John Carter to me sounded like another action movie in the John Wick style, I didn’t even realise it was sci fi