I’ve been seeing a worrying number of these people on Lemmy lately, sharing enlightened takes including but not limited to “voting for Biden is tantamount to fascism” and “the concept of an assigned gender, or even an assigned name, at birth is transphobic” and none of them seem to be interested in reading more than the first sentence of any of my comments before writing a reply.

More often than not they reply with a concern I addressed in the comment they’re replying to, without any explanation of why my argument was invalid. Some of them cannot even state their own position, instead simply repeatedly calling mine oppressive in some way.

It occurred to me just now that these interactions reminded me of nothing so much as an evangelical Christian I got into an argument with on Matrix a while ago, in which I met him 95% of the way, conceded that God might well be real and that being trans was sinful and tried to convince him not to tell that to every trans person he passed, and failed. I am 100% convinced he was trolling – in retrospect I’m pretty sure I could’ve built a municipal transport system by letting people ride on top of his goalposts (that’s what I get for picking a fight with a Christian at 2AM) – and the only reason I’m not convinced these leftists on Lemmy are trolls is the sheer fucking number of them.

I made this post and what felt like half the responses fell into this category. Am I going insane?

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s of course possible to just be opposed to the meat grinder that is modern society without requiring me to be some kind of revolutionary?

    Sure. But people who support the meat grinder will call you one anyway.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah sure but this comment seems to be from the opinion of other "leftists. Although it is actually probably from the perspective of someone who is actually centralist and have just have convinced themselves that they have a political opinion. That way they can look down on everyone and feel smug.

      The right are evil, and the left are apparently religious nut jobs. Yay balance.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Centrists will always have some rationale for dismissing anyone to their left. In this case, they have decided to use the idea that pining after instant and poorly considered revolution is common to all leftists, and have used that stereotype to construct this “authoritarian religious nut” narrative, via which they can dismiss anyone who is less than content with the Democratic Party’s open hostility to the left.

        Hell, just read this thread. It’s a veritable bingo card of dismissal excuses.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      “I oppose the meat grinder but I still need to crank the handle for a living” is some pretty superficial opposition.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I believe that’s basically everyone’s position who isn’t multi-millionaire.

        Also engaging with society is not the same thing as “turning the handle”. The only people who think like that are absolutists and they are as unreasonable as the most ravid of Trump supporters. Don’t listen to them at all, they have no idea what they’re talking about.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I believe that’s basically everyone’s position who isn’t multi-millionaire.

          Its a bit more layered than that.

          Also engaging with society is not the same thing as “turning the handle”.

          Never suggested it was. But the folks who take the most offense inevitable come back with the “My uncle’s a police officer and he’s not so bad, really” or “Yeah sure I work for Lockhead Martin but we actually help protect a lot of people!”

          The internet is rife with folks who simply refuse to see the forest for the trees and cannot imagine being on the receiving end of a system that radiates its worst aspects beyond the borders.

          The only people who think like that are absolutists and they are as unreasonable as the most ravid of Trump supporters

          You know, I’m old enough to remember the pandemic, when folks who were asked to wear masks and get vaccines would scream “Authoritarian!” and “Absolutist!” and “Religious Zealot!” at everyone from the head of the CDC on down to the guy delivering them french fries. I never got to hear it used against proponents of the Iraq War, back when “You’re either with us or you’re with the Terrorists!” though.

          The term has a peculiar usage, in my experience.