• 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    …what?

    I’m referencing the actual report you just linked to. I quoted a section of the report that provides an example of the conduct it criticizes. It’s nothing; the report is bullshit.

    • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      You quoted the section of the report that quotes the linked articles. Apart from the transcript font used, it also links to the footnote.

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I quoted a section of the report that provides an example of the conduct it criticizes.

          You didn’t. You quoted the official statement of the Chinese government, which was quoted in the report. It was not an example provided by the report authors. Their examples and argument is below the quoted section. I’m not sure if you are just misunderstanding or pretending to misunderstand. But in any case, you are welcome to your opinion that the report is “bullshit”. But that is not a good argument if you want to bring someone to your way of thinking. You need more objective details for that.

          • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            7 months ago

            You quoted the official statement of the Chinese government, which was quoted in the report.

            Ah, I see. What page of the report gives the authors’ version of what actually happened in those cases, or gives an example of something that could be described as kidnapping?