• mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      This has to be one of the most politically biased topics when it comes to the media. You never hear these issues when the Republicans are in office. Of course the idea isn’t wrong, it’s just the timing is predictale (Republicans not in office and it’s almost election time).

      • WhatsThePoint@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        7 months ago

        The media is mostly owned by 6 conglomerates that are ran by billionaires who fund the right. It’s predictable because it’s by design. We are basically back in the gilded age.

            • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              7 months ago

              Wow, that’s a lot more entangled than I thought it was going to be. Thank you for this information.

              Bleacher Report has connections? I just thought they were some blog summarizing WWE back when I cared about pro-wrestling.

              • catloaf@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                It’s a terrible visualization, there’s no tangling. Categories like sports are drawn as a point, and all sports media companies have a line drawn to that point. If you look only at the blue and white parts, not the gray, it’s not tangled.

                It also only shows five big companies, when it should also include News Corp, iheartmedia, Warner, Sinclair, Hearst, etc.

            • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Do you have a source for this? I’ve seen charts like these, but they never have a date on them, so I can’t tell if they’re still accurate, or out of date.

              • WhatsThePoint@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Forbes. I didn’t link the article because it’s paywalled (I get it with my Apple News) and I thought this answered the question. I didn’t bookmark the article to post again.

                • Zombie-Mantis@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Thanks 👍

                  With a little reverse-image-searching, it also looks like it’s from 2018. I like this graphic, I’d love to see a more recent version of this. For instance, I think Disney aquired FOX in 2019, and this chart still shows it being owned by 20th Century Fox.

        • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          The irony of omitting that liberal media channels suffer from exactly the same issue.

  • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve always kinda felt that a Venezuelan/Zimbabwean type currency crash has always been the end goal when it comes to US debt.

    Borrow more money than exists many times over.

    Spend the money

    Devalue the underlying currency of the debt to effectively zero

    Fuck over millions upon millions of people

    But hey, the spending was, in the end, all free!

    • WhatsThePoint@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Every central bank system is a perpetual debt machine. It’s why the founding fathers specifically fought against them being established here. If you print the money then loan it to a government, how does the government pay that interest? Central bank loans the government $100 at 1% interest, even if they spend none of it, how do they pay the 1% when the issuer of the currency is also the loaner? Governments have to continue to accumulate debt in this system. They have always been a perpetual and compounding debt system.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        The founding fathers also kept slaves and didn’t let women vote. I’m tired of how Americans deify them, I suggest citing economists as authorities on economics instead of 18th century wealthy landowners.

        • WhatsThePoint@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m not deifying them by mentioning something they got right. I’m tired of people’s all or nothing lack of nuance. Humanity would be nowhere without the advancements of flawed people from the past. We can’t use our measuring stick on their lives without a huge degree of hypocrisy considering how much society has changed even in the last half century. For all their short comings, the founding fathers did create the frame work that most modern democracies are built on and ushered humanity away from monarchy.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Most modern democracies are parliamentary, actually. The US system has not been widely mimicked aside from cherry-picking a few specific details.

            Also, monarchy and democracy are not mutually exclusive. I’m Canadian, for example, which is a democratic constitutional monarchy. We still have a king but we elect our government.

            • scoobford@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Yes, but your king is basically a mascot. If they had any actual power, your system would be less democratic basically by definition.

              • FaceDeer@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Sure, but that’s adding quibbles beyond the scope of what I was responding to. We’re a democracy and we still have a monarch.

        • catloaf@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          They were the economists of their time. Basic economic theory hasn’t changed in millennia, only opinion on how to manage economies has.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            There were economists in the 18th century and none of the founding fathers were one.

            The closest was probably Alexander Hamilton, who ended up as the first treasury secretary. Where he proposed and set up the very central bank that the commenter I was responding to is complaining about.

      • treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Central bank loans the government $100 at 1% interest, even if they spend none of it, how do they pay the 1% when the issuer of the currency is also the loaner?

        Taxes.

        • Wes4Humanity@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Pretty sure they’re saying if we taxes everyone 100%… Collected all the money from everyone in the country, then gave it all back to the central bank we borrowed it from originally, we’d still owe the interest on the debt… With no more money in the system where would we get the “taxes”?

          • treadful@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            As with most debt, it can’t be paid off immediately or it wouldn’t have been debt to being with. It’s a bet on the future.

    • CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I dont think they’ve had that kind of foresight tbh. The goal is to make lots of money and kick the can of being fiscally responsible down the road to the next administration.

      If a global USD is devalued that far, its not just bad for America.

    • Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Worst part is, we all participate so we are the enabler. There are alternatives but people have mostly rejected as media told them it is bad.

      • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I mean, I was more looking for examples of currencies that had crashed to near zero than the specific driving forces behind the illustrations, but ok.

  • No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Have the Pentagon pass a fucking audit and withold money if they don’t and is fixed in a year.

    Failing five in a row is not a joke. Just tell this to your friends when they come talking about Trump and don’t see the big picture.