• horsey@lemm.ee
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    For the census, perhaps. Not for tax purposes.

    • Cataphract
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s adding to the confusion and seems like a weird gotcha, we’re talking about the census as the person posted above as a source. The people who are confused and wrong seem to be stuck on tax filing status for some reason, I’m hoping obfuscation isn’t the goal.

      • horsey@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Where did anyone get the idea that the statistic cited in the OP comes from the census?

        • Cataphract
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          …I’m going to lean on the side of this being trolling unless you’re just lost or not following the full conversation. We are in a comment chain discussing what friend_of_satan@lemmy.world replied to OP with. No one is implying the OP image is census data, people are using the census data to dispute the OP image’s claims. I feel breaking it down further is redundant since you can just scroll back up and read all the replies.

          • horsey@lemm.ee
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            For some reason I’ve been accused of being a troll and being deluded because I said it makes more sense to define household the way the IRS does, and I was told no, it’s about the census. At this point my interpretation is no of here really has a clue what they’re taking about at all. Thanks for the sideways insults though.