• ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        Wasn’t the original usage talking about economies of scale potentially eliminating the need for things like owning a car, because things like Uber would be more efficient and cost effective?

        • umbrella
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          i doubt relying on yet another middleman will make things cheaper

        • WolfdadCigarette@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Yes, from the WEF in particular. It’s such an inane idea that it drips with sarcasm even when sincere. They described a utility without any of the makings of a utility. I wish it hadn’t been adopted by right wingers and turned into a catchphrase.

          • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            It’s also been adopted by left wingers into some kind of threat, when it wasn’t meant to serve that purpose either.

              • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                The kind of person who’s disillusioned with capitalism. Take that to mean whatever you like, but they’ll still use that quote in the wrong context.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yup, but of course everyone got greedy. Last time I used Uber I spent 70 dollars to go 4 miles. I learned my bus map immediately after that

          • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            It was just an example, not a template, and it was more of an idealist projection of some better future based on where we were heading. You’re right that public transit is a far older invention that handles the job better in this case.

            • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              oh agreed. You just made me chuckle because I remember the tech bros saying all of that back then, and how naiive I was for believing it.