Meeting on the High Street multiuse path
It should be interesting, especially after the enthusiastic discussion about the Second Street redesign a few months ago. Will the High Street residents be as excited?
Meeting on the High Street multiuse path
It should be interesting, especially after the enthusiastic discussion about the Second Street redesign a few months ago. Will the High Street residents be as excited?
@bloomington_in
Question about the lane restriping: assurance that all three lanes will be the same size.
Moore’s to Covenanter: culvert is an issue. Question from a homeowner about extra water on his property.
Covenanter to Maxwell: Retaining wall. Stacked stone walls may need replacing. Homeowner complains about that, wanting to keep them. Suggestion that the path not be as wide. Everyone trying to ask questions.
Maxwell to 2nd. Crosswalks to the school, maybe a flasher.
@bloomington_in Second Street light needs replacing. Some rage about driving being less convenient.
Second to Hunter: raised median to cross High at Hunter.
Question about construction, side street access. Each segment to be about a month. Question about detours. Side streets will be open and repaved.
Question about trees. Many to be removed but policy is to replace them.
Question about connecting at Maxwell instead of Hunter. ( I don’t see much gain there). Idea is to get to 3rd Street.
@bloomington_in Homeowner wants the path to stop before it gets to their house. (Whatevs)
Question about a flasher at Hunter. It’s being considered.
Question about budgets. Does it include storm water upgrades? Total just over $5M.
More storm water questions. This seems to be a serious homeowner worry.
Question about narrowing lanes. Will be slightly narrower. Questioner comments that people will have to slow down (Hopefully!) Something about bus passing?
@bloomington_in Question about the existing path south of Arden. Someone yells Apples and Oranges! Someone else endorses it hugely and is looking forward to the new path. Questioner wants some better visualizations.
Question about preserving the character of the neighborhood. They own several properties 🤨
Another question about making the path narrower. Eight feet is adequate! (Groans from the audience). Was there a pedestrian traffic study? City doesn’t do that.
@bloomington_in Question about closing a lane to cars instead. It was studied but city didn’t like it.
Question about native plants in the grass section. More of a homeowner question.
More storm water questions!
Questioner suggests cars will go faster if there are no potholes 😂
Question about putting paths on busy streets instead of side streets.
The whiny rich people whine more.
Question about pedestrian access during construction.
@bloomington_in
Whiny rich people ask about preserving privacy when the peasants use the path, and preserving the character.
General meeting adjourns. People can now come up and look at the maps and ask questions one-on-one.
@benfulton @bloomington_in ruining my positive view of Bloomington residents…thought they would be all supportive of sustainable transportation choices.
@Bikevisionary @bloomington_in The vast majority are, but district 4 is full of large estates within a few blocks of downtown. It’s like a NIMBY breeding ground!