• BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’d argue stick is more practical. You’re already outdoors, stick gives you walking aid, brush clearing, spider web first defense, potential weapon. Even non perfect rocks are useful but a great stick is mikes ahead of a wonky one.

      • Sabata11792@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The stick seems less of a win. Its big and cumbersome once it outlives its usefulness or it breaks. The rock can provide longer but smaller returns, and can outlive your ancestry if taken care of.

        • BowtiesAreCool@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Press X to doubt.

          Stone has one use as a thrown weapon, and you must have accuracy. It could be used as a blunt instrument but that requires very close proximity.

          Alternatively you can sharpen the stick, and have a length to keep things at bay.

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I understand that this is a hypothetical scenario. So please, educate me on how taking a rock vs a stick being “practical” isn’t a wild argument…

      • Sabata11792@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Honestly, people might judge me for carrying a stick out of the woods, a rock can get stuffed in my pocket. The stick will eventually lose its charm and just be in the way. The rock is small and can be forgotten and not be in the way.

        • Empricorn@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I would never judge you for that. You are a rock person, and I think that’s awesome.