The company wants to charge for API access. Its volunteer moderators have other ideas

  • lavender@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    The primary thing with r/pics and its users is that they are creating/posting SFW quality content for free. They are an established platform with an audience, and the tradeoff is that the platform can be used for ads by its owner. This is all fair.

    The main outrage against the blackout is now coming from people who usually scroll, upvote, and consume content. Not content creators. They cannot fathom that their source of entertainment is inaccessible and just want people to stop ‘overreacting’ and get back to scrolling.

    What happens when the platform is no longer reliable, because the owner decided to upset the people making sure the quality remains as established? Sure, someone else will fill the gap, but with these actions I’m sure a lot content creators have flocked to other places. Which leaves the bots, and the lurkers. No content is worse than low quality content.

    I’m curious for what the future brings for Reddit. It feels like it will have a different trajectory compared to Twitter, where anything is content and quality doesn’t matter as much.

    • hillbicks@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Good point about the difference between Twitter and reddit, hadn’t thought about it that way.

      Really interesting development and I have to say that I’m a bit surprised by the resilience the community has shown. On the other hand, this is reddit we’re talking about and there is a reason some of us were there for 10, 15 years. Reddit could be so creative and fucking funny, it really was an awesome place at times.

      I think you’re on point about the content creators,only question is how many of the creators will leave reddit and go somewhere else. Absolutely fascinating stuff.