Kill me now.

  • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I never really developed an association with age as it relates to the term “girl” or “boy”. Sure, I’d call a child a boy or a girl over a man or a woman every time, but there’s not some magical age at which it becomes inappropriate.

    We have brains and we are capable of interpreting things based on context. Things in the real world are fluid and flexible and rigid definitions are silly in the face of societal, cultural, and personal diversity. Stop trying to find outrage. It’s pointless and you end up being wrong more ways than you’re right.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          So then why wasn’t their comment considered ridiculous for the same reason? What was I even conceivably “outraged” about?

          Stop trying to find outrage.

          Am I supposed to be outraged at myself, for continuing to call women “girls?” I literally had this thought because I do it. It’s hilarious because it’s fucking dumb, but y’all are writing screeds about other people “looking for outrage” who are just cracking dumb jokes.

          He was upset enough that he needed to write a comment calling me out for “trying to find outrage.” What a couple of fuckin maroons.

      • FabledAepitaph@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Because communicating facts and ideas is being outraged, I guess. You need to chill out because I’m just here typing words on my phone with basically no emotion associated with any of it lawl.