I read about WhatsApp and how people can’t part with Meta because of it, however no one on my continent uses it. Why is it so popular in the EU and other parts of the world?

  • wahming@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    We’re asking the opposite question outside the states. Why is text messaging so popular in the states, to the point a blue / green checkmark is cause for teenage bullying?

    To provide context, WhatsApp and its ilk came along way before RCS was a thing (it existed, but nobody implemented it). They were widely adopted due to their vast improvement over existing text messaging. So the better question is, why did the states cling to text messaging and never adopted 3rd party chat apps?

    • jeze64@midwest.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I didn’t mean to frame the question as a judgemental post towards WhatsApp users. I’m genuinely curious. SMS sucks, and id gladly use WhatsApp if it was popular here. Instead I resort to things like Discord or RCS chats when available.

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 months ago

        I didn’t see it as judgemental, sorry if I came off as defensive. I just wanted to provide a different viewpoint :)

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        From my own experience as someone living in the UK, probably two reasons, for those countries at least.

        1. Early adoption of the iPhone in the US vs UK
        2. Different price structures between US and UK

        In the 2000s, most people who liked to message a lot in the UK (generally young people and teens) were on pay-as-you-go ‘top up’ plans where each individual message had a cost. SMS messages cost anything from 1 pence to 5 pence, and I remember on my plan, MMS (picture messages) cost a ridiculous 12 pence each! It was expensive. Most people (and especially younger people) had Android phones, and so as soon as a credible Internet-based messenger became popular, people flocked in droves to jump to it. It was WhatsApp in the UK which won that race, and it remains the de-facto messenger to this day.

        Things were different in the US. The iPhone got a huge early foothold in sales, and iMessage became dominant simply by being first to market and gaining critical mass. It was also more common (versus the UK) for people to be on contract plans that had SMS and MMS included as part of the plan cost, so even for people who didn’t have iPhones there was less financial incentive to dump those technologies, and SMS remained prevalent.

    • HottieAutie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’m in the US. For me, I didn’t start using Whatsapp over text messaging because I didn’t have a need to add and learn another app. I only started using Whatsapp when I joined social groups that insisted on it for group messaging. I still prefer messaging via Google messages over Whatsapp.

    • Cover_czar
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      That’s the right question.
      Sms is actually outdated and apple is stubborn in it Usa should had migrated to a privacy friendly alternative like signal or Matrix

      • WellroundedKi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The average Joe uses apple and thus their per-installed apps, Joe has a wrong idea about privacy friendly or secure protocols that apps like signal or matrix have. In a near future, Joe will communicate his friends between different meta apps using the signal protocol and still will consider signal a bad choice just because its marketing is weak compared to meta in the app store. The funny thing is that I’ve back to use whatsapp because most of my fellow US citizens use meta instead of signal or matrix or the fediverse ¯(°_o)/¯

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          The average Joe uses apple and thus their per-installed apps

          Well not so much huge parts of the world where iMessage isn’t used

          • WellroundedKi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 days ago

            Right, but we’re talking about the popularity of text messages in the USA. And usually we don’t call average Joe to someone out of the States ;)

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        That’s obviously true worldwide, but nobody uses the default messaging apps outside the states. So I’m not sure what your comment is meant to illustrate.

        • body_by_make@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Because in other countries everyone uses WhatsApp, it’s sort of a self-fulfilling prophecy. As for why the US kept using text messages while everyone else moved to WhatsApp, that’s because texting in the US became very cheap while it was still very expensive in other countries.

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        To reply to your edit:

        OP is asking why the rest of the world adopted whatsapp, but not the US. Your reply doesn’t really go into any differences between the states and the rest of the world. Everything you’ve said could as easily apply anywhere worldwide.