Voters want change, but still remain unsatisfied with their options

    • Clairvoidance@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean to say I don’t know what you mean with this part

      Most” is past-tense, now. But you know, I’m old so I obviously know nothing and haven’t been around to witness watergate and on.

      • Maeve@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, I see, sorry! What I mean is the days of most presidents receiving advice from educated, and also, being advised by graduates who buy the corporate agenda aren’t exactly “receiving” and what they are receiving is questionable. This is rushed because I’m running late, will be willing to continue later.

          • Maeve@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Again, my apologies. Was thinking n about this as I worriedly shopped for food and realized I can’t afford to eat!

            Reagan had Alzheimer’s, and Nancy governed by astrology.

            The “adults in the room” under tfg’s (He who shan’t be named) refused to govern responsibly, with General Kelly not only “losing” migrant children, but also shuttl*

            Eta: shuttled then to a private adoption agency in which he was heavily invested, iirc. Idk if this is my device, 503 errors or both! Again, my apologies.

            • Clairvoidance@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              kbin.social has been 503’ing, you’re good

              Nancy did definitely set Reagan’s scheduling with the advice of an astrologer to the extent that the astrologer decided the exact date of the 1985 Geneva Summit, though Nancy partially admits it was a coping mechanism due to the assassination attempt on him, I don’t think it’s likely that it influenced the actual decisions being made considering that it was only leaked that the astrologer had an iron-grip on his scheduling to the point where they had to be consulted for Reagan to fly anywhere.

              As for tfg, yeah, I mean I can’t really say much, dude literally hired his son’s girlfriend and shit so fair lmao
              Though I also think it’s fair to say that at least Biden seems to have educated officials where it matters, one of the pros of electing a guy who sees himself as having to do the actual presidential duties ‘by the book’ and that it hopefully reminds people of what an administration is supposed to be.

              This also might be beside the point, but the snopes article on the matter say that there are definitely signs of Alzheimer’s during Reagan’s presidency according to one of his children as well as a journalist who seemed to imply he would have these sort of 5 minute “where the fuck am i” moments, but that the doctors checking up on him during presidency insisted after he was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s that even with the hindsight ‘they never detected any evidence that his forgetfulness was more than just that’ and ‘there was never anything that would raise a question about his ability to function as President,’
              I would say that they probably have had ample opportunity to come clean if they were simply trying to make the it seem like the Reagan years weren’t a result of Alzheimer’s

              • Maeve@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I hear you! I’m skeptical of the doctors’ claims, wrt Reagan; they may not want to discredit themselves, due or not. And I’ma skeptic in general, since working political memory, beginning with the Watergate debacle (ik it’s biased, but Rachel Maddow had an interesting reminder of the Agnew charges and how DOJ kept him from running, facing multiple charges).

                I’m not arguing that Biden doesn’t have credentialed advisors, I’m arguing he’s too far right, and that’s evidenced by his voting record/Ms Hill’s complaints during the Thomas confirmation hearings. A singular recent example is the rail worker strikes, and that he supported industry, this “always been a union guy.” Yeah, in the Pullman Car Company union sort of way (10,000 Men Named George).

                • Clairvoidance@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Biden is definitely more right than I want him to be, and he might even hide that he’s more than that via the appealing to negotiating with the other side (though there are various motivations we can attribute that to, like wanting to highlight the point of the US political system or to show that the other side doesn’t want to negotiate)
                  The unionbusting is definitely atrocious, and I don’t really think he could de-escalate anything Taiwan, and the protectionism turns me the hell off, but outside of that I think he’s doing good for a guy who was initially invited in as Obama’s vice to appeal to the more conservative dems (*simplifying a lot)

                  • Maeve@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    The Dixiecrats?! Yep. I’m sorry, I just can’t get behind him (or Kamala). Wasted though it may be, I have to vote my conscience, whether that’s third party or write-in. I just wish (yes, ik) that everyone else who is dissatisfied would do the same.