This is crazy

  • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Chomsky is absolutely a minarchist. He has stated that some structures of authority are admissible in non-ephemeral forms if they can be justified as “necessary” for the common good. But justified to whom? By what metrics? It’s just another way of saying, “only the small subset of hierarchies I agree with”.

    • Five@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It sounds like you’re saying you don’t think Noam Chomsky is an anarchist. Is that correct?

      • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I think that Chomsky thinks he is a “pragmatic” anarchist, which in his view means accepting certain hierarchies if people decide they’re “necessary”. If he were making pragmatic tradeoffs in the process of actually, actively organizing an anarchistic society, I’d say that is a necessary evil. Barring that, I think it’s an unnecessary own-goal at best. Personally, I don’t know him, and have no reason to trust his good intentions in insisting that fellow anarchists accept, quite oxymoronically, certain anarchist hierarchies.

        • Five@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you think Chomsky thinks he is an anarchist. But you don’t think he’s an anarchist, is that right?

          • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            In essence, yes, I personally think he’s a minarchist.

            I don’t hold anyone else to that, though; if you prefer to consider him an anarchist, feel free.