This has happened once before and they reversed it. But they said this last time too:

The discussions that have happened in various threads on Lemmy make it very clear that removing the communites before we announced our intent to remove them is not the level of transparency the community expects, and that as stewards of this community we need to be extremely transparent before we do this again in the future as well as make sure that we get feedback around what the planned changes are, because lemmy.world is yours as much as it is ours.

https://lemmy.world/post/3234363

  • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    When the people using a free service you’re not obligated to provide try and shame you for not taking on multimillion dollar legal departments.

    • lorty
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      The communities they banned are only for the discussion of piracy(whick is legal). There are no copyrighted material hosted in any of them.

      • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        It doesn’t matter if they’re blessed by the Pope himself. The people who run the instance get to decide what moves through it.

        • lorty
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes, and I can voice my dissatisfaction with it. I’m not sure what your point is other than trying to tell me to shut up in a more verbose way.