• aidan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    The reason why it was the deadliest shooting is because the shitstain was using a bump stock

    No, he was looking over a massive crowd of people with a rifle. He may have killed more people without a bump stock, given the difficulty it causes for accuracy. Saying it is a settled fact that it led to the deaths is just not true.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      He didn’t exactly need accuracy when there was a sea of targets in front of him, especially if his objective was to hit as many of them as possible before they could disperse.

    • 24_at_the_withers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I mean, he didn’t really have much of a problem with accuracy - he fired a total of 1058 rounds, and those rounds or shrapnel from them injured 413 different people. Of course, many people received more than a single gunshot wound. He killed 58 (later 60) in ten minutes of shooting – effectively one person every 10 seconds. I think it would be difficult for a single person to injure or kill more from where he was standing with any weapon short of an RPG.

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        kill more from where he was standing with any weapon short of an RPG.

        I think short of somehow knocking down a build that would make it more difficult because of the very slow reload speed.

        kill more from where he was standing with any weapon short of an RPG.

        And a semi-auto rifle can fire much faster than that without a bumpstock