Vice President Kamala Harris on Friday called on the federal government to move “as quickly as possible” to change the way it officially classifies marijuana, saying that “nobody should have to go to jail for smoking weed.”

“I cannot emphasize enough that they need to get to it as quickly as possible,” Harris said. “We need to have a resolution based on their findings and their assessment. This issue is stark when one considers the fact that on the schedule currently, marijuana is considered as dangerous as heroin ― as dangerous as heroin ― and more dangerous than fentanyl, which is absurd, not to mention patently unfair.”

Marijuana is currently listed as a Schedule 1 drug by the Drug Enforcement Administration. That classification designates it one of the most dangerous drugs possible, with no medicinal uses. Other substances in the same category include heroin, ecstasy and LSD. Marijuana advocates have been pushing for years for the federal government to either reschedule marijuana to a different category or deschedule it entirely.

  • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    So lies and deception? I don’t know who is left to deceive when this sounds like the position the WH had two decades ago (when Biden was in Harris’s exact role). Since then the only changes have been brought about by State’s thumbing their nose at the Federal Government. I can honestly say the argument for “State’s Rights” hold more promise for marijuana legalization than Harris’s words.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Neoliberals dont want elected to help people, they want to get elected.

      It’s why they can see something like this where a president could do something day 1, but waits four years before doing it, and call it smart strategy. Even when it’s not a political.process and the president can do it on their own.

      It’s why there’s always the focus on “stopping by the republican”.

      That’s all neoliberals want to accomplish, get in office and hold on as long as they can.

      Progressives want to get elected to help people, and have faith if you help people they’ll vote for you.

      There’s no sane reason for neoliberals to be running the Dem.party on national and state levels, but it’s a private party and they get an absolute shit ton of money from billionaires and corporations. So it’s very hard to kick their old asses out of power while also fighting off conservative extremist Republicans.

      But when the neoliberals wins, nothing gets fixed. Their dogs chasing a car, if they catch it they dont know what to do, so they lay down and wait for another car to drive by.

      • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Progressive idealism is all well and good, but without acknowledging the realities of a highly polarized world and the balances of power in play all it will ever be is idealism, never realized fact.

        Many of the broader growths in society didn’t have a defining ‘flip the switch’ moment and instead where the result of small changes that then where the building blocks to bigger ones after the smaller steps where accepted as normal parts of society.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        “They wait 4 years to accomplish their policy proposals, this is evidence they never accomplish any policy proposals”

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          They wait 4 years to accomplish their policy proposals

          Don’t act like they’ve accomplished them.

          • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            You have to realize that there’s a certain element of theatrics to politics right? With the flood of information thrown at people everyday the population has the attention span and memory of goldfish often as not. Had they done some drastic change day one (if it could even pass congress/courts without being killed) it’d be long forgotten old news by now.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Yes, it’s much better to drag it out until the very last possible second, since it’s not like people are suffering due to the deliberate prolongation of the racist drug war.

              It’s still disrupting the communities it was designed to disrupt, so let’s talk about how great it is that we’re trying to game the timing of fixing this. I’d ask if it’s possible to be more cynical, but I already know it is because we’re playing the same timing game with Netanyahu’s genocide.

              Yes, it’s theatrical. And people are being used as props.

              • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Didn’t say it was good, but it’s reality. The alternative of attempting to do everything you have on a wishlist with no compromise or negotiation, and thus getting nothing is hardly better. Had it been tried to push everything to max results day one would at best, in some imagined place get all that in, be forgotten 3 years later as ‘what have you done for me lately’ and caused the opposition to be energized en masse to put their guy in and rip it all back out the next day.

                A small win that’s held is worth far more than a massive one lost shortly after.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The alternative of attempting to do everything you have on a wishlist with no compromise or negotiation, and thus getting nothing is hardly better.

                  Neat false dichotomy. Enjoy the drug war dragging on for as long as possible and hurting communities in pursuit of putting on a good show.

            • Landsharkgun@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              EDIT: Thought better of that one.

              But seriously, stuff treating millions of people’s lives like a fucking game. You disgust me.

      • idiomaddict@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        The problem is that this is potentially the only positive change they could make in people’s lives that might actually make money, so once they’ve done it, there’s nothing else that lines up with both the interests of the party and their voters. Even prison reform as a whole might be a net loss in spite of the current system’s incredible cost to taxpayers due to the chilling effect it has on social mobility and the slave labor that the bourgeoisie can profit off of.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          We can’t do the only easy thing we can do because then we won’t have any easy things we can promise to do that we just won’t!!!

          • idiomaddict@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Exactly. Why would they actually move on it, if it’s the only bargaining chip they’re willing to use? The republicans fucked up by doing that with abortion, though because that oppresses people instead of liberating them, the gop is doubling down on it. Dems don’t have the option to do that, so we’re left with easily actionable campaign promises going unfulfilled for four years.