• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s gonna take two months to build the pier.

    Countless will starve to death by then, and it seems like a forgone conclusion Israel is going to claim it’s not safe to let Gaza control it.

    They’ll seize the port, and a stretch of land connecting it to Israel.

    If Biden really wanted to do something now, he’d send US military with the aid trucks.

    It’s the only way to prevent Israel from attacking the aid

    • jordanlund@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      We aren’t going to engage in a military operation AGAINST Israel. We SHOULD, but we never will.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        What?

        American military escorting American aid isn’t a military action against Israel

        Israel claims they can’t let aid trucks in because Hamas will steal it.

        American escort means Israel can’t use that excuse, and if Israel attacks it, they’d be attacking the American military.

        That isn’t a military action against Israel in any way shape and form.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The argument for escorting aid in is because Israel will attack it… So what is the logical outcome of Israel attacking a US guarded convoy?

          We are not going to put our people in that situation.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            That still wouldn’t be a military action against Israel, and no American troops would be in Israel territory.

            What you’re saying is that Israel would view preventing their genocide against Palestinians as an attack on them and then be “forced” to attack the US troops…

            Israel would have to decide if they want to attack US military members to stop aid.

            I’m not talking about hiding one soldier in a crate for a “gotcha”. I mean a loud and proud military escort of aid. Something that is 100% normal regardless of it’s a war zone or not.

            I’ve spent 6 months of my life doing exactly this, lots more doing other stuff in the military.

            I know what I’m talking about.

            Not to mention, by your logic that would make Bidens plan to build a single pier over two months a military action as well…

        • jordanlund@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          The US? Oh, absolutely. We’ve been protecting and justifying Israel’s bad behavior for decades now.

          The analogy I like to use is Israel is the shitty little kid on the playground who thinks he can get away with anything because “my big brother can beat you up!”

          It’s going to keep happening until big brother steps aside and lets him get his nose bloodied.

          • Nudding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Genocide sounds way cuter when you use a children’s analogy. We’re all adults here so we don’t need cutesy analogies though. Joe Biden structured arms deals in a way that wouldn’t meet the minimum amount for congressional oversight, in order to enthusiastically deliver weapons being used in a genocide. A genocide that’s obvious to us commoners should be fucking pretty obvious to the person with the most military intelligence in the world. So, either he’s stupid as fuck, or an evil son of a removed.

            Either way, he needs to face justice.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Technically they don’t have to finish the pier, we have vehicles made to transport marines and even tanks from sea to land. Even without our amphibious units, in May 2023 the USA had 3 ships delivering aid to shore in the Red Sea near Saudi Arabia in a shorter timespan.

        • BakerBagel@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          The army turned Omaha Beach into a working supply area on June 7th under German artillery fire. They can make a pier in less than a week in Gaza no problem if they wanted to.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            There’s a lot we could do. We could end this genocide with one phone call honestly.

            The threat of abandoning Israel and withdrawing our forces in the area would make Israel agree to anything. They just know Biden isn’t willing to do anything close to that.

            We’re talking about what Biden is willing to do in the timeline Biden is willing to do it in.

            And that’s 2 months for the US military to build a pier.

            Hell we don’t even need a pier.

            A LHD has a fucking hovercraft, helicopters, and can hold an insane amount of supplies.

            I spent a couple years on one, and even did aid missions like this before.

            We might not be able to provide electricity and water without pier connections, but we don’t need a pier to provide packaged aid.

            • nxdefiant@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              I really don’t believe that’s true. I think Israel’s leaders have lost their goddamn minds and they’d be willing to end themselves and the rest of the Middle East in nuclear fire if it came down to it, which it probably would if the U.S. decided to wash their hands of Israel.

              If I had to lay a bet, it’s that the pier is the beginning of a US outpost in Gaza, as a check to Israeli expansion.

      • Nudding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’ll take longer than that, once Israel starts “accidentally” bombing the site lol.

  • GBU_28@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I swear Israel must be privately threatening to nuke Iran.

  • S_204@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    Maybe they should stop attacking the aid trucks. The Egyptians aren’t gonna put up with that shit, and once they’re angry the gazans are gonna be in some trouble.

      • S_204@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        They dgaf, never have and probably never will. On this one, they shouldn’t either. Fuck Hamas, they need to go. That’s how Palestinians will get the freedom and peace they deserve. Simping for Iran ain’t a winning formula.

        • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Even if Hamas is gone (this won’t happen because their leadership is in Qatar), Israel will just fund another fundie group so they can continue the genocide.

          • S_204@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            9 months ago

            Bro, not only is there no genocide, their population is increasing during this war. They’ve got one of the highest birth rates in the world!

            • Urist
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              “No genocide” because there are not enough dead for you yet or because of some artificial definitions in use by enitities such as the UN?

              EDIT: No mass murder can be classified as genocide until the US gives the green light, am I right?

              • S_204@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                9 months ago

                No genocide by any definition other than the ones drummed up by the white Western saviour brigade.

                • Urist
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Merriam-Webster:

                  the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group

                  How are the Palestinian communities not being deliberately and systematically destroyed? There is no “oopsie doopsie I just blew up and later colonized your homes” caveat. Also, had it not been for the US blocking resolutions, the world community, including the global south, would have denounced Israel long ago through the UN, opening for possible peace keeping troop deployment.