For those of you here who think the prime directive is flawed, or could be adjusted.

What do you agree with, how would you change what you disagree with, and why?

  • Nmyownworld@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s an interesting perspective. I agree that “this is a set law” can be perceived as anything not covered being construed as legal (although not necessarily moral). Which could lead to the creation of a new law, or the change in an existing law, to cover the new territory. I also agree that with a guideline a lot depends on acting in good faith. I think the Prime Directive is vague when the situation is the destruction of a civilization due to a natural cause, not from the actions of the civilization.

    Say a natural event – a meteor or asteroid or solar flare or something – will cause an extinction level event on the planet with a pre-warp civilization. And, Starfleet has the means to prevent such a thing. As long as the pre-warp civilization never knows that their destruction was prevented by Starfleet, whether choosing to save the civilization or to doing nothing and allow it to be destroyed, are both following the Prime Directive. For me, that’s where the Prime Directive is vague. Or, quite likely, I’m unsuccessfully trying to process two vastly different outcomes having the same value, i.e. not violating the Prime Directive.

    • lxskllr@mastodon.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      @Nmyownworld

      It is vague, and I would consider that positive. In your asteroid example, neither approach would lead to hard disciplinary action, but perhaps leadership could stress that moving the asteroid was the better approach, and that would propagate through channels, so the next time, a captain will act accordingly.

      Pike’s interference is a little less clearcut. I think he did the right thing, and leadership seems to agree.

      • lxskllr@mastodon.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @Nmyownworld

        The debriefing can propagate through channels, and others can use it as a guideline to compare with their situation when it occurs.

        The outcomes for what a captain does can range from a hand wavy “Good job”, to a week’s long tribunal that ends with the captain stripped of rank and sent to a prison camp.

        It’s imperfect, as everything is, but it’s a good workable system when used by elite professionals, and will result in a positive outcome more times than not.

        • lxskllr@mastodon.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          @Nmyownworld

          Precedent will make it better over time.

          Sorry for the multipost. I’m on Mastodon, and have a character limit. I’m trying to limit my accounts, and working within restrictions, but I’m not sure the Mastodon-Lemmy is working out.

          • Nmyownworld@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            No worries about the multi-post. Of course, you must do what works best for you. Hopefully, that decision will keep you posting here on Star Trek. Your views and opinions are interesting and welcomed.