• RonSijm@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      4.2 (5 ratings)

      5 ratings… doesn’t really seems like anyone is actually using this. The $20/user/month is probably a hail mary of “Lets throw this product out there, and if just one company with like 100 users accidentally enables this thing, we’re good”

    • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Slack does it for free, at that price you can probably afford the Slack subscription instead of using Teams

  • Oliver Lowe@apubtest2.srcbeat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    Huh wow didn’t know Teams didn’t have multiple screen sharing. Nice work.

    Something does irk me about the whole approach, though. We have accomplished some amazing stuff in the software world. But Jesus almighty we have some serious interoperability problems, to the point where we literally just send pixels to one another because that’s all we’ve got. Reminds me of that glib statement “the web has become just 4 websites full of screenshots of each other” (or however it goes).

  • alienabductionsg@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Thanks for the link! My company has been looking for something like this for YEARS, we’re definitely gonna give it a look