3volver@lemmy.world to Unpopular Opinion@lemmy.world · 10 months agoYou can't claim to be an environmentalist and be anti-nuclear energy at the same timemessage-squaremessage-square133fedilinkarrow-up1163arrow-down168
arrow-up195arrow-down1message-squareYou can't claim to be an environmentalist and be anti-nuclear energy at the same time3volver@lemmy.world to Unpopular Opinion@lemmy.world · 10 months agomessage-square133fedilink
minus-squareConyak@lemmy.tflinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down2·10 months agoI am 100% supportive of nuclear and still disagree with OP. Not supporting nuclear does NOT automatically mean you are not an environmentalist. That is just beyond stupid to me.
minus-squarespujb@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down2·edit-210 months agook but i think there’s a big distinction between “not supporting” and being anti-nuclear energy, which is what OP actually said.
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down5·10 months agoI disagree. I think it’s a small, nitpicky distinction. OP made his meaning clear.
I am 100% supportive of nuclear and still disagree with OP. Not supporting nuclear does NOT automatically mean you are not an environmentalist. That is just beyond stupid to me.
ok but i think there’s a big distinction between “not supporting” and being anti-nuclear energy, which is what OP actually said.
I disagree. I think it’s a small, nitpicky distinction. OP made his meaning clear.