• fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I don’t think really any amount of this particular form of data is enough to be confident in an opinion.

    As an analogy, I might be obese and have chest pain, but without scans and tests no doctor is going to say I have ischaemic cardiovascular disease.

    Does a 77yo who mixes up names have dementia? Is it just diminished cognitive abilities due to age, combined with stress? Does it really matter?

    IMO, any self-respecting psychologist would avoid paying an opinion without having a chance to interview a co-operative patient.

    • maniclucky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      That makes sense, and I feel like that’s a good rule for 99.99% of people. Trump introduces one unusual facet and one that I don’t know enough about:

      1. He’s on camera all the time. His media presence is more than that of most of humanity, including those that do it professionally. Both being filmed and participating. Sure, a doctor needs scans to do things, but what is the test for this kind of thing and can the answers be derived from his very prominent existence?

      2. How does a therapist handle a non-cooperative patient? Let’s say the court order’s therapy. What does the poor bastard who works with him have to do to accomplish their task?